monogamy MDYKD5

Nov 232012
 
 Posted by on UTC 2012.11.23Fri at 21:54 monogamy MDYKD5 1 Response »

MAZBVC:THIS POST

  1. MAYCNN:should be updated ~1x/3months; simply re-load/refresh & check-back then; ID of last entry is version.
  2. M87XAJ:has all key details BOLD with most-essential & -timely first.
  3. MAZBWQ:has SUBSECTIONS: DEFINITIONIN-PRACTICE, EVALUATION, ALTERNATIVESPOST TODO, FOOTNOTES, POST HISTORY.

MDFB2Z:DEFINITION

  1. MDYNDF:The general definition seems to be: two creatures both “being romantic” only/exclusively with the other “for some extended period”
    during which the relationship (t[……]MORE
Nov 232012
 
 Posted by on UTC 2012.11.23Fri at 13:12 monogamy MDYKD5, romance M1X6TS No Responses »

M2DM60 Version 0.2 (so constructing)

  1. M2DMAP: Title & URL: (monogamy=romantic-exclusivity to 1 other): do, pretend, or not do? http://1.JotHere.com/2806#M2DM60

  2. M2DMEI: Overview

    1. M2DMF1: Since people have very strong opinions & feelings about this, the possibilities are listed from most to least familiar & accepted
  3. M2DMAY: Do

    1. M2DMRL: Pros thru Cons:
      1. M2DNFD: Huge short-term Pro but long-term Con: caters to romantic jealousy, the leading romantic anti-love.
      2. M2DNVB: Huge-Big Pro: what about 94% of women instinctively want for themselves.
      3. M2DNG[……]MORE