intangible resource

NMG5MX ‘-’ ‘‘intangible resource’

  1. ‘‘definition’ ‘anew’’
  2. NZMWW6 ‘per def’ ‘same or similar’ ‘sub’
    1. NZMVZH -1~ ‘1’
      1. NZMUF2 non-transferrable (uniquely) per ‘resource’ transferability
    2. ‘Wikipedia’
    3. NZMVYG 1~
      1. NZMESGservice LGUBX7’ requires ‘ability NMG95W
        1. NZMETN so I’m doubting both categories, especially ‘‘ability NMG95W’’, should be kids of ‘intangible resource NMG5MX’
          1. NZMF0Z so ‘‘service LGUBX7’’ a kid of ‘‘ability NMG95W’’?
      2. NZMVYU ‘1’  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intangible_asset
  3. NZMVID ‘name anew’ ‘intangible ‘resource’’ ‘rendering anew’
    1. NZMVK9‘intangible resource’
    2. NZMVJC ‘intangible resource NMG5MX’ –starting at time of concept id
  4. ‘compared to’
  5. annex
Sep 262015
 

NV7C6Y    “intro & overall”

  1. NV7CAX  ‘This {post & its comments}’s ‘TOU(Terms Of Use) including copyright ©, confidentiality/privacy, &[……]

    Read more

May 272015
 

NOLZ16: NOLZ16: ‘-’

  1. NYM1X1: ‘This {post & its comments}’s ‘TOU(Terms Of Use) including copyright ©, confidentiality/privacy, & info’s allowe[……]

    Read more

Jun 062013
 

MAZBVC: post essentials